Big Data and Stream Processing 101 – Part 2: How to Create a Simple Ranger Policy

In order to continue the series “Big Data and Stream Processing 101”, I created a little video to show the most basic operation of Apache Ranger: Apache Ranger can do much more, but the most basic operation is creating a single policy for a single resource and a single user.

It’s not best practice to give single users access to certain resources. For productive setups you’d look more into giving certain roles access to certain resources or tags. But that’s not being discussed here.

The video does not have sound. So turn on some music and enjoy 🙂

Part 1: Overview of Tools and Frameworks

The Concepts of Tag-Based Authorization

What is classical authorization?

The answer to this question is resource based authorisation. Everybody is familiar with resource based authorization. It’s about managing a set of policies for all resources, i.e., databases, tables, views, columns, processes, applications and others. That means whenever you create a new resource, you need to create a new policy that matches this resources with users or groups and assigns adequate permissions to them.

In resource-based authorization security policies match resources with users/groups.

Thus, authorization services must be aware of the resources (from a specific resource providing service) as well as users and groups (usually from an authentication provider, such as an Active Directory).

The Process

The authorization service connects to the resource-providing service to be aware of the resources. The service typically knows which types of permission the specific resources allow for. In the diagram below you see a simplified process of how resource based authorization typically works and how the “stakeholders” interact.

Typical components and interactions involved in resource based authorization

In the Big Data landscape the de-facto standard authorization service is Apache Ranger.

Tag Based Authorization

Tag-based authorization is not so much more different. Instead of having a set of policies that match resources with users/groups, you create a set of policies that match tags with users/groups. This means also, that you need another instance or service to match resources with tags. Now, whenever you create a new resource, the only thing you need to do is to tag it. All existing policies for that tag will automatically apply for the new resource. This gives you more flexibility if you have a complex authorization model in your company, because one tag might be connected with multiple security policies:

  • It saves you from duplicating the same policies from similar resources
  • It’s more user-friendly and comes more natural to assign tags to a resource than thinking about which permissions/policies might be required, everytime you add a new resource.

In tag-based authorization security policies match tags with users/groups.

The Process

As mentioned before, an additional service is needed to manage the relationship between resources and tags. The authorization service knows the resource, syncs user and groups as well as the tags for the resources. The tag provider knows the resource and is the interface for the user to assign tags to the resource.

Typical components and interactions involved in tag-based authorization.

You can manage tags and govern your data sources using Apache Atlas. Apache Atlas integrates well with Apache Ranger and other services in the Big Data Landscape and can be integrated with any tool by leveraging its REST API.

Create Useful Tags

Tagging is powerful, since you can look from different angles at your resources, i.e., you can introduce multiple dimensions. Once you decided to go with tag-based security, the first step is to think about which dimensions you want to introduce in the beginning. The second step is to consistently apply those dimensions across your resources.

You can think of dimensions as categories of tags:

  • One category of tags classifies a resource, e.g., a database based on the source system the data came from: MySQL, Server Log, HBase, …
  • Another category of tags introduces the dimension of use cases: cyber_security, customer_journey, marketing_campaign2, …
  • A third category might be the career level within a company: common, manager, executive
  • Another category of tags distinguishes departments: sales, engineering, marketing, …

As long as you are consequently tagging your resources appropriately, the advantages of tagging in the context of authorization are immediately apparent: When you create a new resource, for example a Hive table, you apply the tags MySQL, customer_journey, executive, marketing and based on the pre-defined tag-based policies you’ll know that

  • The technical user, that does the hourly load from the MySQL database to Hive has write access to the table.
  • The team of all people that work on the customer journey project has read access to the table.
  • All employees on the executive level have read access to the table.
  • The marketing department has full access to the table.

Conclusions

I hope this article made it easy to understand the process and benefits of tag-based authorization. However, simplified security is only one of the benefits of tagging. Tagging is also useful to describe lineage and thus facilitate data governance.

Hadoop Security Concepts

While security is a quite complex topic by itself, security of distributed systems can be overwhelming. Thus, I wrote down a state of the art article about Hadoop (Ecosystem) Security Concepts and also published it on Hortonworks Community Connection.

In the documentation of the particular security related open source projects you can find a number of details on how these components work on their own and which services they rely on. Since the projects are open source you can of course check out the source code for more information. Therefore, this article aims to summarise, rather than explain each process in detail.

In this article I am first going through some basic component descriptions to get an idea which services are in use. Then I explain the “security flow” from a user perspective (authentication –> impersonation (optional) –> authorization –> audit) and provide a short example using Knox.

When reading the article keep following figure in mind. It depicts all the process that I’ll explain.

Component Descriptions and Concepts

Apache Ranger

Components and what they do:

  • Ranger Admin Service:
    • Provides RESTful API and a UI to manage authorization policies and service access audits based on resources, users, groups and tags.
  • Ranger User sync:
    • Syncs users and groups from an LDAP source (OpenLDAP or AD)
    • Stores users and groups in the relational DB of the Ranger service.
  • Ranger Plugins:
    • Service side plugin, that syncs policies from Ranger per default every 30 seconds. That way authorization is possible even if Ranger Admin does not run in HA mode and is currently down.
  • Ranger Tag Sync:
    • Syncs tags from Atlas meta data server
    • Stores tags in the relational DB of the Ranger service.
  • Ranger Key Management Service (KMS):
    • Provides a RESTful API to manage encryption keys used for encrypting data at rest in HDFS.
  • Supporting relational Database:
    • Contains all policies, synced users, groups, tags
  • Supporting Apache Solr instances:
    • Audits are stored here.

Documentation:

  • For the newest HDP release (2.6.0) use these Ranger Docs

Apache Atlas

Components:

  • Meta Data Server
    • Provides a RESTful API and a UI to manage meta data objects
  • Metastore
    • Contains meta data objects
  • Index
    • Maintains index to meta data objects

Documentation:

  • For the newest HDP release (2.6.0) use these Atlas Docs

Apache Knox

  • Knox serves as a gateway and proxy for Hadoop services and their UIs so that they can be accessible behind a firewall without requiring to open too many ports in the firewall.

Documentation:

  • For the newest HDP release (2.6.0) use these Knox Docs

Active Directory

Components:

  • Authentication Server (AS)
    • Responsible for issuing Ticket Granting Tickets (TGT)
  • Ticket Granting Server (TGS)
    • Responsible for issuing service tickets
  • Key Distribution Center (KDC)
    • Talks with clients using KRB5 protocol
    • AS + TGS
  • LDAP Server
    • Contains user and group information and talks with its clients using the LDAP protocol.
  • Supporting Database

Wire Encryption Concepts

To complete the picture I just want to mention that it is very important, to not only secure the access of services, but also encrypt data transferred between services.

Keystores and Truststores

To enable a secure connection (SSL) between a server and a client, first an encryption key needs to be created. The server uses it to encrypt any communication. The key is securely stored in a keystore for Java services JKS could be used. In order for a client to trust the server, one could export the key from the keystore and import it into a truststore, which is basically a keystore, containing keys of trusted services. In order to enable two-way SSL the same thing needs to be done on the client side. After creating a key in a keystore the client can access, put it into a trust store of the server. Commands to perform these actions are:

  • Generate key in "/path/to/keystore.jks" setting its alias to "myKeyAlias" and its password to "myKeyPassword". If the keystore file "/path/to/keystore.jks" does not exist, this will command will also create it.
keytool -genkey -keyalg RSA -alias myKeyAlias -keystore /path/to/keystore.jks -storepass myKeyPassword -validity 360 -keysize 2048
  • Export key stored in “/path/to/keystore.jks” with alias “myKeyAlias” into a file “myKeyFile.cer”
keytool -export -keystore /path/to/keystore.jks -alias myKeyAlias -file myKeyFile.cer
  • Import key from a file “myKeyFile.cer” with alias “myKeyAlias” into a keystore (that may act as truststore) named “/path/to/truststore.jks” using the password “trustStorePassword”
keytool -import -file myKeyFile.cer -alias myKeyAlias -keystore /path/to/truststore.jks -storepass trustStorePassword

Security Flow

Authentication

Only a properly authenticated user (which can also be a service using another service) can communicate successfully with a kerberized Hadoop service. Missing the required authentication, in this case by proving the identity of both user and the service, any communication will fail. In a kerberized environment user authentication is provided via a ticket granting ticket (TGT).

Note: Not using KERBEROS, but SIMPLE authentication, which is set up by default, provides any user with the possibility to act as any other type of user, including the superuser. Therefore strong authentication using Kerberos is highly encouraged.

Technical Authentication Flow:

  1. User requests TGT from AS. This is done automatically upon login or using the kinit command.
  2. User receives TGT from AS.
  3. User sends request to a kerberized service.
  4. User gets service ticket from Ticket Granting Server. This is done automatically in the background when user sends a request to the service.
  5. User sends service a request to the service using the service ticket.

Authentication Flow from a User Perspective:

Most of the above processes are hidden from the user. The only thing, the user needs to do before issuing a request from the service is to login on a machine and thereby receive a TGT or receive it programmatically or obtain it manually using the kinit command.

Impersonation

This is the second step after a user is successfully authenticated at a service. The user must be authenticated, but can then choose to perform the request to the service as another user. If everyone could do this by default, this would raise another security concern and the authentication process would be futile. Therefore this behaviour is forbidden by default for everyone and must be granted for individual users. It is used by proxy services like Apache AmbariApache Zeppelin or Apache Knox. Ambari, Zeppelin and Knox authenticate as “ambari”, “zeppelin”, “knox” users, respectively, at the service using their TGTs, but can choose to act on behalf of the person, who is logged in in the browser in Ambari, Zeppelin or Knox. This is why it is very important to secure these services.

To allow, for example, Ambari to perform operations as another user, set the following configs in the core-site.xml, hadoop.proxyuser.ambari.groups and hadoop.proxyuser.ambari.hosts, to a list of groups or hosts that are allowed to be impersonated or set a wildcard *.

Authorization

Authorization defines the permissions of individual users. After it is clear which user will be performing the request, i.e., the actually authenticated or the impersonated one, the service checks against the local Apache Ranger policies, if the request is allowed for this certain user. This is the last instance in the process. A user passing this step is eventually allowed to perform the requested action.

Audit

Every time the authorization instance is called, i.e., policies are checked if the action of a user is authorized or not, an audit event is being logged, containing, time, user, service, action, data set and success of the event. An event is not logged in Ranger in case a user without authentication tries to access data or if a user tries to impersonate another user, without having appropriate permissions to do so.

Example Security Flow Using Apache Knox

Looking at the figure above you can follow what’s going on in the background, when a user Eric wants to push a file into the HDFS service on path “/user/eric/” from outside the Hadoop cluster firewall.

  1. User Eric sends the HDFS request including the file and the command to put that file into the desired directory, while authenticating successfully via LDAP provider at the Apache Knox gateway using his username/password combination. Eric does not need to obtain a Kerberos ticket. In fact, since he is outside the cluster, he probably does not have access to the KDC through the firewall to obtain one anyway.
  2. Knox Ranger plugin checks, if Eric is allowed to use Knox. If he’s not, the process ends here. This event is logged in Ranger audits.
  3. Knox has a valid TGT (and refreshes it before it becomes invalid), obtains a service ticket with it and authenticates at the HDFS namenode as user “knox”.
  4. Knox asks the service to perform the action as Eric, which is configured to be allowed.
  5. Ranger HDFS plugin checks, if Eric has the permission to “WRITE” to “/user/eric”. If he’s not, the process ends here. This event is logged in Ranger audits.
  6. File is pushed to HDFS.

I hope this article helps to get a better understanding of the security concepts within the Hadoop Ecosystem.